This review highlights advancements in animal bone processing methods and potential applications in agriculture and biomedicine, suggesting a path for sustainable practices.
Animal bones are abundant co-products of the meat industry and a strategic source of calcium and phosphorus alongside valuable proteins (collagen/gelatin). This review synthesizes advances (2020–2025) across the full processing chain—from preparation and cleaning to four principal routes: (i) rendering to bone meal/flour for feed and slow-release fertilizers; (ii) calcination to bone ash with tunable hydroxyapatite (HAp), β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and α-TCP for fertilizers and bioceramics; (iii) hydrothermal/chemical approaches for collagen/gelatin extraction and soluble phosphates (e.g., DCP/MCP); and (iv) biotechnological pathways, including phosphate-solubilizing microbes and hydrothermal treatment + anaerobic digestion with nutrient recovery. We consolidate operating windows (e.g., ~700–950 °C for HAp-rich ash; ~900–1050 °C for BCP; >1125 °C for α-TCP; 120–180 °C for subcritical-water extraction), decision points, and quality metrics (XRD/FTIR phase analysis, BET/porosity, citrate/NAC or DGT phosphorus availability, Bloom strength for gelatin). Industrial applications span agriculture (recycled P fertilizers), food (gelatin/collagen), biomedical (HAp/TCP biomaterials), and energy (bone char, biogas), with environmental and regulatory sections outlining sanitary safeguards (ABP categories, feed-ban rules) and EU fertiliser market entry (FPR/CMC pathways). We identify research gaps in harmonized QA/QC across routes, decision-grade LCA/TEA for electrified or intensified processing, field-scale agronomy for bone-derived P fertilizers, and regulatory interoperability to enable cross-border trade. Overall, bones represent a high-leverage circular feedstock; with fit-for-purpose processing and robust compliance, they can deliver environmental benefits, economic resilience, and advanced materials performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: