Cross-sectional study finds 79% compliance to iron folic acid among antenatal women, highlighting the role of counselling.
Background: Anemia is a common condition among antenatal women, and the most significant cause of it is iron deficiency. Many countries, including India, have policies to provide iron supplements to them. However, noncompliance is a major obstacle in fighting anemia. Objective was to determine the compliance to iron folic acid supplements and its influencing factors among an antenatal women attending antenatal clinic in a secondary level health care centre in north Kerala. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 110 antenatal women attending antenatal clinic in a secondary level health centre in Kannur. Subjects were recruited through consecutive sampling. Data was collected by direct interview using a semi structured questionnaire. Missing >2 doses consecutively was considered as noncompliance. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to find the association of compliance. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of the study population was 26.5±4.59 years. The compliance to IFA supplementation was 79%. Noncompliance was mainly due to forgetfulness (52%) and side effects (44%). Among antenatal women with comorbidities, 61.5% had less compliance compared to those without comorbidities and is statistically significant (p value <0.01). Antenatal counselling had a significant association with compliance (p value <0.001). Antenatal women who received counselling (85.6%) were more compliant. Conclusions: The compliance to IFA supplementation among antenatal women was 79%. Forgetfulness and side effects were the main factors for noncompliance. The presence of comorbidities was significantly associated with lower compliance, and antenatal counselling was strongly linked to improved compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muniaraj et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: