Analytic cross-sectional study finds improved diagnostic accuracy of assays in HIV-positive individuals, suggesting better outcomes.
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health concern, responsible for about 10 million morbidities and 1.3 million global deaths, of which 300,000 are HIV co-infected. Timely diagnosis and treatment of TB have saved millions of lives. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) assays and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra have greatly altered TB diagnosis, but information on their performance in terms of accuracy, efficiency and turnaround time is limited. This analytic cross-sectional study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of urinary LAM and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra in TB detection among adult HIV-positive individuals receiving care at Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital. Methods: Participants (n=372) were enrolled from facility Xpert testing log, where all patients with Xpert-positive results were recruited. Results: There was variation in sensitivity between AlereLAM (10.8%), FujiLAM (53.2%), and EclLAM (66.7%), and generally high specificities: AlereLAM (92.3%), FujiLAM (98.9%), and EclLAM (98.1%). GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra had a 90.5% sensitivity and 98.1% specificity, without significant difference in sensitivity or specificity by previous TB history, hospitalization, or HIV status. Xpert and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra results were concordant, with the latter showing a small reduction in specificity (difference 1.9; p=0.01). Considering trace results as positive for all cases increased sensitivity by 2.1% (p=0.01) without reduction in specificity (p=0.08). Conclusions: FujiLAM and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra have the capacity to improve TB diagnosis, especially in HIV-positive individuals and in high-burden settings, with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. Integrating these assays can boost prompt treatment initiation and better patient outcomes, although further research is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ongwae et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: