This study develops a multiplex lateral flow assay for accurate detection of COVID-19 and influenza, suggesting improved diagnostic efficiency.
Objectives This study investigates diagnosis of upper respiratory diseases with similar clinical symptoms, specifically COVID-19, originated from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and Influenza infections associated with influenza viruses. Effective treatment relies on rapid and accurate diagnosis, especially due to pandemic potential. This research aims to develop a multiplex lateral flow assay (LFA) based diagnosis method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A H1N1 viruses simultaneously. Methods Lateral flow assay utilizing gold nanoparticles were developed with specific monoclonal antibodies targeting the nucleocapsid (NP) protein of SARS-CoV-2 and the hemagglutinin (HA) protein of Influenza A H1N1. Multiplexing was achieved by immobilizing two different capture antibodies for both targets on the same test. Recombinant antigens were employed to perform analytical assessments of specificity and cross-reactivity. Results The limit of detection (LOD) of the developed system in both single and multiplex formats was found to be: 1 ng/mL for SARS-CoV-2 NP, 1 × 10 3 PFU/mL for active viruses and 5 ng/mL for Influenza A H1N1 HA. Negative control experiments confirmed no cross-reactivity among target antigens, demonstrating high assay specificity. The low LOD values and absence of cross-reactivity indicate excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity. Simultaneous detection of both pathogens offers significant advantages for rapid clinical decision-making and infection control. Conclusions Our research presents a potential diagnostic approach utilizing a singular LFA platform for the early and accurate detection of COVID-19 and Influenza infections. The proposed multiplex strategy could improve public health outcomes by facilitating rapid therapeutic intervention and successful disease management during respiratory infection epidemics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BİLİCİ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: