Survey data highlights 62-75% of college students view AI as unethical, suggesting cognitive dissonance and policy gaps.
This research paper examines the AI paradox in Indian higher education, where a significant proportion of college students view artificial intelligence (AI) tools as ethically problematic or akin to cheating, yet continue to employ them extensively. Drawing on secondary survey data from 2023-2025, the study explores psychological and ethical factors driving this behavior, amid inadequate institutional guidance and fragmented policies. Key findings reveal that 62-75% of students perceive AI as cheating, but usage persists at 40-70%, influenced by cognitive dissonance, moral disengagement, and cultural pressures like exam-centric education. The literature review identifies a gap in India-specific analyses, while the methodology relies on thematic analysis of reports from organizations such as Deloitte India, Turnitin, UNESCO, and NITI Aayog. The analysis highlights policy fragmentation, with only 30% of universities having AI guidelines, and recommends unified ethical frameworks. This paradox underscores the need for proactive institutional reforms to align AI adoption with academic integrity, fostering a balanced educational ecosystem. Implications extend to policymakers, educators, and students, advocating for AI literacy programs to resolve ethical ambiguities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Udayan Kachchhy (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: