Retrospective analysis reveals diagnostic advantages of risk of malignancy index in ovarian tumors, suggesting improved patient outcomes.
Background: Ovarian carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women, often diagnosed at advanced stages due to non-specific symptoms. Early differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms is crucial for optimal management. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and sociodemographic profiles, histopathological spectrum, ultrasonographic features, serum CA125 levels, and the diagnostic performance of the risk of malignancy index (RMI) in ovarian tumors at a rural tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 119 ovarian neoplasm cases from July 2022 to June 2023. Demographic, clinical, histopathological, and CA125 data were analyzed. RMI-2 was calculated, and its performance was compared with ultrasound (USG) scoring and CA125 levels. Results: Of 119 cases, 62.18% were benign, 5.04% borderline, and 32.77% malignant. The mean age was 39.8±14.9 years. Benign tumors predominated in pre-menopausal women, whereas malignancies were more frequent post-menopausally (P<0.0001). Elevated CA125 levels (>35 U/mL) were seen in 97.78% of malignant/borderline tumors. CA125 alone showed high sensitivity (97.78%) but lower specificity (67.57%). RMI demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy (84.87%) than CA125 or USG alone. However, RMI was less effective in differentiating mucinous tumors from benign lesions. Conclusion: Ovarian tumors exhibit diverse morphological patterns and demographic associations. RMI, combining clinical, biochemical, and radiological parameters, offers improved accuracy for pre-operative discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors, guiding surgical management, particularly in resource-limited settings. Nonetheless, caution is warranted in interpreting RMI for mucinous neoplasms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samaddar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: