Commentary evaluates public reception of forensic investigative genetic genealogy, suggesting improvements for policy and trust.
Forensic Investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) is a technique used to help identify the source of crime scene DNA or other unknown DNA sources. FIGG is a relatively new practice with several controversial aspects and relies on patchwork regulation in the United States. Two recent studies evaluated FIGG implementation and its public reception; this commentary summarizes and compares the findings of each in a discussion of the importance of public perspectives to evolving policy and practice. These recent empirical reports support new approaches to maintaining public trust in FIGG, including practitioner accreditation and certification, as well as educating and involving the public in further development of the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlquist et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: