This research demonstrates the variation in pathogenicity of colletotrichum isolates on citrus species, highlighting significant disease severity differences.
Thirty‐nine Colletotrichum species have been reported as having all or part of their life cycle as pathogenic or endophytic to citrus globally; they predominately colonise leaves, fruits and twigs of multiple Citrus species. However, previous pathogenicity bioassays of Colletotrichum species on Citrus have been mostly based on wounding host tissues prior to inoculation, which leads to a biased measure of pathogenicity. Isolates of seven Colletotrichum species isolated from citrus in Australia were inoculated onto detached young asymptomatic leaves, untreated with chemicals, 3 weeks after bud appearance, of lemon ( Citrus × limon ‘Eureka’), Meyer lemon ( Citrus × meyeri ) and orange ( Citrus × sinensis ‘Washington Navel’) using a non‐wound inoculation method. Colletotrichum australianum , C . gloeosporioides and C. siamense were the most aggressive species on Citrus species. Variable levels of aggressiveness and pathotypes were identified between isolates within C . australianum , C. fructicola , C . gloeosporioides , C. novae‐zelandiae and C. siamense on certain Citrus species, suggesting multiple isolates of one Colletotrichum species need to be used in testing the disease severity of the pathogen on a host species. Colletotrichum isolates exhibited variation in aggressiveness and pathotype differences among the three Citrus species. Lemon was relatively more resistant to Colletotrichum species. The grouping of disease severity was almost constant for all Colletotrichum isolates 3 and 5 days after inoculation. The development of a robust leaf‐based pathogenicity bioassay has provided a better understanding of the pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species on Citrus , which will assist in the development of effective control strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: