A random forest model identifies key factors influencing gas-particle partitioning of OOMs, highlighting the importance of humidity and aerosol characteristics.
Gas–particle partitioning governs the fate of oxygenated organic molecules (OOMs) and the formation of organic aerosols. We employed a Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer equipped with a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsol (FIGAERO-CIMS) to measure the gas–particle distribution of OOMs in a winter campaign in the urban atmosphere. The observed gas–particle (G/P) ratios show a narrower range than the equilibrium G/P ratios predicted from saturation mass concentration C* and organic aerosol content. The difference between observed and equilibrium G/P ratios could be up to 10 orders of magnitude, depending on the C* parameterization selection. Our random forest models identified relative humidity (RH), aerosol liquid water content (LWC), temperature, and ozone as four influential factors driving the deviations of partitioning from the equilibrium state. Random forest models with satisfactory performance were developed to predict the observed G/P ratios. Intrinsic molecule features far outweigh meteorological and chemical composition features in the model's predictions. For a given OOM species, particle chemical composition features, including pH, RH, LWC, organic carbon, potassium, and sulfate, dominate over meteorological and gaseous chemical composition features in predicting the G/P ratios. We identified the positive or negative effects as well as the sensitive ranges of these influential features using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and curve fitting with a generalized additive model (GAM). Our models found that temperature does not emerge as a significant factor influencing the observed G/P ratios, suggesting that other factors, most likely associated with particle composition, inhibit the gas–particle partitioning of OOMs in response to temperature change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: