Qualitative analysis reveals syntactic patterns in prompts from English Education students, indicating varying grammatical accuracy and engagement with generative AI.
This study investigates the syntactic features of prompts formulated by English Education students at Syiah Kuala University when interacting with ChatGPT for academic purposes. Specifically, it examines sentence length, sentence form (imperative or interrogative), and grammatical accuracy in prompts related to the Morphology and Syntax course. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected from three students in semester six or above, each submitting five naturally composed prompts. The findings reveal a dominance of imperative sentences, with varying degrees of sentence length and grammatical correctness. While most prompts were structurally sound, occasional errors—particularly in complex constructions—highlighted syntactic challenges. The study provides insight into students’ linguistic competence in AI-assisted learning environments and emphasizes the need for further syntactic awareness in prompt engineering. These results contribute to growing discussions on digital literacy and the pedagogical implications of using generative AI in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basith et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: