Observational analysis highlights vaccine responsiveness and immune recovery in childhood cancer survivors, suggesting urgent need for booster vaccinations.
Background Waning immunity from childhood vaccines can be more profound in pediatric patients following chemo/immunotherapy. Moreover, childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at significantly increased risk for life‐threatening infections. We implemented an institutional standard of practice (SOP) to assess immune reconstitution and provide recommendations for re‐vaccination for non‐transplant CCS. Methods A lymphocyte mitogen proliferation panel was obtained at around 6 months off therapy to assess non‐specific lymphocyte proliferation to phytohemagglutinin (PHA), concanavalin A (Con A), and pokeweed mitogen (PWM). Serologic concentrations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured for hepatitis B (hepB) virus, tetanus toxoid, and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Booster vaccines were recommended for seronegative patients. Catch‐up vaccines were recommended for CCS not previously up to date. Results All evaluated patients were considered immune reconstituted at 6 months off therapy. Most patients (about 80%) were seronegative for hepB virus and S. pneumoniae , but nearly 100% retained immunity against tetanus. Most patients had positive seroconversion with a single booster vaccination with hepB (86%) and PPSV23 (76%). There were missed opportunities with each step of the institutional SOP due to provider omission with varying degrees depending on the provider. Conclusions This study suggests that most CCS are ready for re‐immunization with inactivated vaccines by 6 months of therapy and underscores the need for boosters to optimize protection against vaccine‐preventable infections. Future studies are needed to inform consensus guidelines adapted to patient age, underlying cancer diagnosis, and treatment intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: