Cross-sectional study shows sarcopenia correlates with balance performance in older adults, indicating potential fall risks.
Objectives: Sarcopenia has been hypothesized to affect balance and increase fall risk. This study investigated the influence of sarcopenia measures on balance performance, assessed using the timed-up and go test (TUG), in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 315 older adults aged ≥60 years (mean age = 68.02 ± 5.88) from selected communities in Selangor, Malaysia. Assessment included Strength, Assistance in walking, Rising from a chair, Climbing stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire (5-items: Strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs and falls), muscle mass (MM) (Bioelectrical impedance analysis), muscle strength (MS) (grip dynamometer), and physical performance (PP) (5-times chair stand). Balance performance was assessed using the TUG test, which measures balance through combined movements including walking and turning. Results: About 182 (58.78%) and 133 (42.22%) participants showed low and normal balance performance, respectively. Chi-square tests indicated that MM ( P = 0.043), SARC-F, MS, and PP (all P < 0.01) differed significantly between groups. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis showed balance performance was significantly associated with SARC-F (odds ratio [OR]: 0.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.48]), MS (OR: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.04, 1.09]), and PP (OR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.82]). In the adjusted model (age and gender), SARC-F, MS, and PP remained significantly associated with balance performance, including MM (OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.50, 0.73]), indicating those with low balance performance have a higher risk of sarcopenia with lower MS, MM, and PP. Conclusion: Sarcopenia may influence balance in older adults. Early screening with the SARC-F tool may help detect sarcopenia, while continued research on targeted interventions could reduce fall risk in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Openg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: