Cross-sectional analysis highlights practice variation in arterial catheter techniques and indications among pediatric critical care clinicians.
BackgroundThere is not a consensus in critical care medicine on when arterial catheters are indicated, nor is there evidence that ACs improve patient outcomes. There is wide variability in AC use across PICUs that is independent of illness severity.ObjectiveTo characterize arterial catheter placement practices among pediatric critical care clinicians and identify practice variability in techniques, indications, and attitudes.DesignAnonymous, cross-sectional web-based survey.Measurements and Main ResultsData were collected from 377 pediatric critical care practitioners across 93 institutions. The majority were attending physicians (n = 215, 57.0%) or fellows (n = 141, 37.4%). Ultrasound was always used for arterial catheter placement by 52.0% (196/377) of respondents, with fellows being more likely than attendings to use ultrasound (P = .005). The catheter-over-wire (Seldinger) technique was the most common insertion method (332/377, 88.1%). For site selection, the radial artery was preferred for peripheral placement (97.3%), and the femoral artery for central cannulation (81.1%). There was substantial variability in the reported indications for arterial catheter use, with 68.9% considering single vasoactive support as an indication.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates wide practice variation in arterial catheter placement among pediatric ICU clinicians, despite the existence of some practice guidelines. Future research should focus on addressing gaps in evidence, particularly around ultrasound-guided techniques and securement methods, to optimize practices and improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pilarz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: