Qualitative research reveals AI's impact on efficiency and strategic tasks among young chartered accountants, suggesting pivotal changes in professional practices.
This study investigates how young Chartered Accountants (CAs) approach AI in their professional practices. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with young Italian CAs. Findings highlight that AI adoption among CAs follows two main approaches: horizontal and vertical. The horizontal approach focuses on improving efficiency in routine or peripheral tasks (e.g., scheduling and content creation) through self-directed learning and experimentation with general-purpose AI tools. It represents an entry point into digital transformation, fostering AI literacy. The vertical approach applies AI to strategic, high-value tasks (e.g., forecasting and market analysis), requiring structured training in data analytics and predictive modelling. It reflects a more profound professional evolution, where AI becomes a "cognitive assistant" for decision-making, strategic analysis, and innovation. While both approaches offer significant benefits, they also share risks and challenges, including data privacy issues and output reliability, and have a different impact on the CAs-Client relationships. The two approaches are also analysed using a functional and an evolutionary perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sentuti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: