This method validates chromatographic conditions for detecting artesunate in urine, suggesting effective monitoring of drug levels.
Background: Malaria is a significant health threat. Artesunate is an effective treatment for it, but because it binds strongly to haemoglobin, monitoring drug levels in urine is essential to determine its effective concentration. Objective: This study aims to optimise and validate the chromatographic conditions and sample preparation for quantifying artesunate in urine using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Method: Artesunate levels in urine were analysed via UHPLC-MS/MS, with artemisinin as the internal standard. Separation was achieved using a C18 column (Shim-pack XR-ODSIII, 50 mm × 2.0 mm, 1.6 μm) at a column temperature of 30°C. The optimal mobile phase consisted of methanol-0.3% formic acid in water (80:20, v/v), delivered at 0.3 mL/min under isocratic elution. Result: Detection utilised a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive electrospray ionisation (ESI+) mode, monitoring transitions at m/z 407.15 → 261.10 for artesunate and m/z 305.00 → 151.10 for artemisinin. Sample preparation involved protein precipitation with 300 µL of methanol, followed by vertexing (one minute) and centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 15 minutes, 4°C). The method achieved a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 2 ng/mL and demonstrated linearity across the range of 2–400 ng/mL. Conclusion: The method met 2022 EMA validation criteria, including selectivity, precision, linearity, recovery, accuracy, and stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baihaqi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: