Court's decision affects the right to privacy in matrimonial disputes, suggesting marriage reduces privacy rights.
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Vibhor Garg v Neha (2025) holding that a husband may produce non-consensually recorded phone calls as evidence in a matrimonial dispute seems to suggest that marriage puts an end to the right to privacy between spouses. The court’s broad, sweeping conclusions miss the nuance needed to address a complex legal question that called for balancing competing principles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alok Prasanna Kumar (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: