This analysis unveils a hybrid CNN-Transformer framework that significantly improves prediction accuracy for flexural capacity in UHPC structures, highlighting essential design parameters.
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is increasingly employed in long-span and heavily loaded structural applications; however, the accurate prediction of its flexural capacity remains a significant challenge because of the complex interactions among geometric parameters, reinforcement details, and advanced material properties. Existing design codes and single-architecture machine learning models often struggle to capture these nonlinear relationships, particularly when experimental datasets are limited in size and diversity. This study proposes a compact hybrid CNN–Transformer model that combines convolutional layers for local feature extraction with self-attention mechanisms for modeling long-range dependencies, enabling robust learning from a database of 120 UHPC beam tests drawn from 13 laboratories worldwide. The model’s predictive performance is benchmarked against conventional design codes, analytical and semi-empirical formulations, and alternative machine learning approaches including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Results show that the proposed architecture achieves the highest accuracy with an R2 of 0.943, an RMSE of 41.310, and a 25% reduction in RMSE compared with the best-performing baseline, while maintaining strong generalization across varying fiber dosages, reinforcement ratios, and shear-span ratios. Model interpretation via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identifies key parameters influencing capacity, providing actionable design insights. The findings demonstrate the potential of hybrid deep-learning frameworks to improve structural performance prediction for UHPC beams and lay the groundwork for future integration into reliability-based design codes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: