PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 5, 2025Journal of Functional Biomaterials16 citationsOpen Access

A Histological and Clinical Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Bovine Bone-Derived Xenografts in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
AIAngelo Michele InchingoloGMGrazia MarinelliITIrma Trilli

Key Points

  • Bovine-derived xenografts demonstrate favorable long-term outcomes in bone regenerative procedures, supporting their use.
  • Graft integration and implant survival rates were reported as satisfactory across the studies included in the review.
  • The systematic review included 11 studies assessing various outcomes related to bovine bone-derived xenografts.
  • Further high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to address the variability in study designs and outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Bovine bone-derived xenografts are widely used in regenerative dental procedures due to their osteoconductive properties and volumetric stability. However, their long-term behavior and biological integration remain a subject of debate. This systematic review aims to critically assess the histological and clinical outcomes associated with bovine xenografts over extended follow-up periods. Methods: An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, including studies published in the English language from 2005 to 2025 for a total of 217 records, which were initially identified from PubMed, Scopus, and Wos. Results: After duplicate removal, following title/abstract screening and full-text evaluation, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on the use of bovine-derived xenografts in clinical contexts, assessing parameters such as graft integration, histological remodeling, complication incidence (e.g., chronic inflammation or foreign body reactions), and implant success rates over time. Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that bovine-derived xenografts, particularly Bio-Oss®, are associated with favorable long-term outcomes in bone regenerative procedures, demonstrating satisfactory graft integration and implant survival rates. However, variations in study design, follow-up duration, and outcome measures warrant further high-quality, long-term randomized clinical trials to confirm these findings and guide clinical decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Inchingolo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb4d276d6d5674bcd01301https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090321
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Collagenated Xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone Material Without Covering With a Membrane: A Tunnel Pouch Technique—4-Year Follow-up—A Pilot Clinical Study2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Buccal Fat Pad–Derived Stem Cells in Three-Dimensional Rehabilitation of Large Alveolar Defects: A Report of Two Cases2018 · 31 citations
  4. 4Effect of Intact Periosteum on Alveolar Ridge Contour Stability after Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Region: a Retrospective and Radiographical Cohort Study.2023 · 2 citations
  5. 5A comparison of the bone regeneration and soft‐tissue‐formation capabilities of various injectable‐grafting materials in a rabbit calvarial defect model2018 · 8 citations