Observational study evaluates healing outcomes after sequestrectomy using bovine xenografts in MRONJ, suggesting potential benefits.
Background/Objectives: Bisphosphonates, a class of drugs that are widely used in the treatment of neoplastic diseases, can lead to the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This condition is challenging to manage due to the high incidence of postoperative complications: superinfections, local wound dehiscence, or fractures in pathological bone. The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic role of bovine-derived xenografts in the management of MRONJ. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients with confirmed stage II or III MRONJ, after surgical treatment with Bio-Oss application. All patients had received zoledronic acid therapy, which was discontinued for a minimum of four months prior to surgical intervention. The surgical protocol included local debridement, sequestrectomy, and grafting of the residual defect with a bone substitute, followed by periodic clinical evaluations and monitoring of local healing with a follow-up period of up to one year. Results: Of the total number of patients treated according to this surgical protocol, 85.71% achieved favorable healing without complications at 8 weeks. Cases with poor local healing results were more likely to have prolonged zoledronic acid administration. Conclusions: Within the limits of this retrospective observational study, the use of bovine-derived xenografts following sequestrectomy in stage II–III MRONJ was associated with satisfactory local healing in several cases. However, considering the limited sample size and lack of a comparator group, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. To better understand the connection between the length of antiresorptive therapy, surgical management techniques, and postoperative outcomes, more prospective, multicenter trials with bigger patient cohorts are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maracineanu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: