Comparative analysis reveals strategies to resist autocratization in polarized environments, highlighting the role of democratic institutions.
Autocratization, the progressive degradation of democratic structures and norms, poses a significant threat to democracies characterized by pronounced division and persistent polarization. This paper aims to enrich the contemporary discourse by examining the interplay between polarization and autocratization strategies within diverse societal contexts. Employing a comparative case study methodology with examples drawn from Turkey, the United States, Hungary, and Zimbabwe, among others, the article elucidates the multifaceted factors that facilitate autocratization and identifies potential avenues for resistance. Strategies proposed encompass dialogue and consensus formation, fortifying democratic institutions, enhancing civic education and media literacy, fostering cross-ideological alliances, and capitalizing on international resources. The paper concludes that while resisting autocratization in polarized societies is undeniably challenging, it remains feasible through collective efforts aimed at bolstering democratic resilience and curbing authoritarian expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oyinkansola Akinmade (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: