Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals connections between militant constitutionalism and the rule of law in democratic systems, suggesting the need for a public ethos.
This article uses Böckenförde’s dictum and Williams’s paradox of liberalism as a framework to critically analyse the current theoretical literature on democratic regression and rule of law backsliding in liberal democracies. It argues that the current literature is too strongly focused on (a) the problem of militant democracy (thereby neglecting militant constitutionalism ) and (b) on the formal institutional safeguards that are needed to make liberal democracies resilient (thereby partially neglecting the need for a public ethos). In addition, it claims that such an ethos not only implies a democratic attitude but also a patriotic or constitutional attitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ronald Tinnevelt (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: