In The Noumenal Republic , Rainer Forst understands democracy as a demand for justice grounded in the ‘right to justification’. This right stipulates that justificatory reasons must be (i) reciprocally and generally justifiable in their content/form and (ii) generated through procedures in which all affected figure as co-authors. Despite the numerous strengths of this theory, I argue that Forst’s account encounters a problem when addressing the justification of commonplace cases of representation: although each dimension independently provides normative space for justifying representative practices, their simultaneous application generates mutually undermining outcomes. After showing how Kant deals with this issue, I invite Forst to further elaborate on how his Kantian democratic theory plays out at an institutional level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elisabeth Theresia Widmer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: