This observational analysis evaluates synthetic graphite's performance as an anode in lithium-ion batteries, suggesting potential improvements over commercial benchmarks.
Graphite remains the most widely used anode material in lithium-ion batteries, and the initial formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) largely dictates the long-term performance of commercial cells. Developing new graphite anode to diversify the supply chain remains challenging due to proprietary formation protocols and inconsistent test formats. In this study, we evaluate a pitch-coated synthetic graphite developed by James Durrans & Sons against a commercial benchmark using a harmonized methodology across coin, 3 electrode PAT cell, and pilot line built single-layer pouch cells. By standardizing electrode morphology, formation procedures, and testing conditions, we isolate the influence of active material properties e.g. how first cycle loss is linked to SEI formation and how coatings and cycling conditions (e.g. temperature and additives) can influence it. Under “like for like” comparative studies of NMC 811//graphite pouch cell, the modified synthetic graphite developed displayed higher rate performance and increased capacity retention at 1C over 200 cycles over established commercial counterparts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oseland et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: