Cross-sectional study assessed adherence to CDC guidelines in hospitalized patients, highlighting low compliance rates.
Abstract Aim: Urinary catheterization contributes significantly to hospital-acquired infections. Adhering to CDC guidelines is vital to prevent inappropriate use and reduce infection rates. This study evaluated compliance with these guidelines in hospitalized patients at a tertiary hospital in 2024. Methodology: A cross-sectional study assessed compliance with CDC guidelines for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in hospitalized patients at Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan. Data were gathered through patient observation and chart reviews, evaluating demographics, catheter indications, retention duration, and guideline adherence. Department-specific compliance rates were also analyzed. Standardized checklists ensured consistent data recording. Results: Of 1262 patients evaluated, 477 (37.8%) underwent urinary catheterization, with a 57.3% adherence rate to CDC guidelines. The most common appropriate indication was acute urinary retention (15.4%), followed by urine output monitoring in critically ill patients (14.5%) and intraoperative monitoring (11.1%). Adherence was highest in cardiology and urology, while gynecology, rheumatology, plastic surgery, and vascular surgery had the lowest rates. The emergency department showed only 27.8% adherence. Conclusion: The findings highlight a suboptimal adherence rate to CDC guidelines in urinary catheterization, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve compliance. Strategic interventions can enhance adherence and subsequently reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Ethics approval code: IR.MUI.MED.REC.1401.326). All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahdadian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: