Experimental analysis demonstrates significant reductions in NOₓ and hydrocarbon emissions in dual-fuel engines, suggesting ammonia's potential in decarbonization efforts.
As internal combustion engines (ICEs) remain dominant in maritime transport, reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is critical to meeting IMO’s decarbonization targets. Ammonia (NH3) has gained attention as a carbon-free fuel due to its zero CO2 emissions and high hydrogen density. However, its low flame speed and high ignition temperature pose combustion challenges. This study investigates the combustion and emission performance of NH3-diesel dual-fuel engines, applying Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for multi-objective optimization of key operating parameters: ammonia fraction (AF: 0–30%), engine speed (1200–1600 rpm), and altitude (0–2000 m). Experimental results reveal that increasing AF led to a reduction in Brake Thermal Efficiency (BTE) from 39.2% to 37.4%, while significantly decreasing NOₓ emissions by 82%, Total hydrocarbon emissions (THC) by 61%, and CO2 emissions by 36%. However, the ignition delay increased from 8.2 to 10.8 crank angle degrees (CAD) and unburned NH3 exceeded 6500 ppm, indicating higher incomplete combustion risks at high AF. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed AF as the most influential factor, contributing up to 82.3% of the variability in unburned NH3 and 53.6% in NOₓ. The optimal operating point, identified via desirability analysis, was 20% AF at 1200 rpm and sea level altitude, achieving a BTE of 37.4%, NOₓ of 457 ppm, and unburned NH3 of 6386 ppm with a desirability index of 0.614. These findings suggest that controlled NH3 addition, combined with proper speed tuning, can significantly reduce emissions while maintaining engine efficiency in dual-fuel configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: