Numerical analysis evaluates deformation and reinforcement tension in MSE walls during seismic events, revealing limitations of pseudostatic designs.
Practice has shown that reinforced soil walls are able to withstand quite well seismic events. Their modularity and soil – reinforcement interaction allow them to experience significant deformation without failing. Nevertheless, up to now it has been a challenge to estimate the residual deformation of a MSE wall after an earthquake. The most common seismic design approach is the equivalence with a pseudostatic force. This approach is generally conservative and as such it may overestimate the displacements of the structure. The seismic action is a variable motion that changes amplitude, direction, and frequency. Moreover, the amount of motion that a MSE wall will experience depends on its size and stiffness (natural frequency and internal design). This article presents a numerical (finite differences model) analysis of a typical MSE wall using a real earthquake recording. The goal is to evaluate the structure response during and after the seismic motion in terms of deformation and reinforcement tension. A case with longer reinforcement is included for studying the effect of longer strips in the dynamic response of the wall. A comparison is done with pseudostatic force approach to highlight the differences in the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oltion Korini (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: