This analysis compares historical and GARCH volatility in hedging option contracts, suggesting optimal strategies. Results highlight variable performance across market conditions.
Purpose: This study examines the implementation of option contracts in the Black-Scholes model by comparing historical volatility and GARCH volatility using a collar strategy on TLKM, EXCL, and ISAT shares for the 2007–2024 period, aiming to determine the most appropriate model under crisis and normal conditions. Research/methodology: The Black-Scholes model is applied with two volatility estimation methods historical and GARCH on options with 1-month and 3-month maturities, analyzed across crisis and non-crisis periods. Results: For TLKM, with a 1-month maturity, GARCH outperformed historical volatility except during the 2008–2009 crisis; for 3 months, historical volatility outperformed in 2007, 2008–2009, and 2023–2024. For EXCL, historical volatility outperformed at 3 months in all conditions and at 1 month during crises; GARCH outperformed at 1 month in non-crisis periods. For ISAT, GARCH outperformed at 1 month except during the 2008–2009 crisis; historical volatility outperformed at 3 months during the non-crisis periods of 2007, 2023–2024, and the 2008–2009 crisis. Conclusions: Performance varies by volatility method, maturity, and market condition. GARCH tends to perform better for short-term maturities in non-crisis periods, while historical volatility performs better for longer maturities and certain crisis periods. Limitations: This study is limited to TLKM, EXCL, and ISAT stocks from 2007–2024, using only Black-Scholes and GARCH models with collar strategy, and may not generalize to other sectors or instruments. Contribution: The study offers empirical evidence on optimal volatility modeling for hedging in Indonesia’s telecommunications sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: