Qualitative analysis investigates the role of Islamic economic principles in enhancing MSME performance and sustainability in Indonesia, suggesting pathways for community-based empowerment.
Sharia-based Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) represent a critical driver of economic development in Indonesia, contributing significantly to employment, poverty alleviation, and local entrepreneurship. In a country with the world’s largest Muslim population, the integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah principles into MSME governance offers a unique pathway toward ethical and inclusive economic growth. This study investigates the institutional, financial, and socio-religious dynamics that shape the performance and sustainability of Sharia-compliant MSMEs. It explores how Islamic economic principles intersect with regulatory frameworks and market practices to influence business outcomes in this sector. The objective is to formulate a conceptual and practical model for strengthening Sharia-based MSMEs in Indonesia. Adopting a qualitative approach, this research utilizes document analysis from regulatory texts, journal articles, and Islamic economic theory. Findings reveal critical challenges in legal harmonization, limited access to Sharia-compliant financing, and inconsistent application of ‘adl (justice), amanah (trust), and raḥmah (compassion) in entrepreneurial practices. However, notable opportunities exist in the areas of community-based empowerment, halal certification, and fintech adoption aligned with Islamic values. This study contributes to both policy and academic discourses by offering an integrative perspective on Sharia-based MSMEs. It highlights the importance of strengthening tawhidic foundations in economic structures and provides a roadmap for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars committed to building an inclusive and just economic system rooted in Islamic ethics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rukmanda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: