Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy analysis reveals uneven distribution of palliative care tools and stakeholder involvement in China.
Background To summarize the evolution trend of China’s hospice policy, dissect the possible instrumental problems of the policy, and provide reference for the optimization and improvement of China’s hospice policy. Methods Policy document analysis was used to encode and examine palliative care policy texts. The use of policy tools was assessed across three dimensions: policy types, participating entities, and temporal trends. Results A total of 36 policy documents were analyzed. In the X dimension, 253 codes were identified, with environmental, supply, and demand policy tools comprising 57.71, 23.32, and 18.97%, respectively. In the Y dimension, 423 codes were identified, with government agencies, medical institutions, social organizations, and healthcare professionals comprising 73.05, 18.44, 4.96, and 3.55%, respectively. In the Z dimension, 253 codes were identified, corresponding to three stages: initial exploration (10.67%), in-depth exploration (14.62%), and pilot implementation (74.70%). Conclusion Palliative care in China is gradually advancing. However, policy tools remain imbalanced, with a strong emphasis on environmental tools over demand-side tools, leading to internal structural inconsistencies. The allocation of policy tools among stakeholders is also uneven, characterized by a single-entity dominance and a government-driven supply model. It is recommended that policies be aligned with their developmental stages, the structure of policy tools be optimized, balanced utilization among stakeholders be ensured, and role differentiation and collaboration enhanced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: