Comparative Evaluation of Rapid Prototyping Processes for Product Development Using Optimization Techniques

Creating innovative products within stringent timeframes presents a significant hurdle for small-scale manufacturers, highlighting the necessity for innovative solutions. To develop products effectively, it is essential to have a deep understanding of the complex interplay between product features, manufacturing processes, and market requirements. In this context, a technique known as Rapid Prototyping (RP) has emerged as a promising solution, but its successful implementation relies on specialized expertise and the ability to navigate intricate variables. For example, the design and optimization of water sprinklers offer opportunities for innovation in both commercial and agricultural contexts, with key factors such as water pressure and coverage playing a crucial role. Regular testing of prototypes ensures the efficacy of these systems, making RP the preferred method for prototyping. However, the implementation of RP is often hindered by a lack of skilled expertise and the complexity of process parameters. This research conducts a comparative evaluation of RP methods, using a decision-making approach that considers multiple criteria to assess product attributes such as surface finish, production duration, accuracy, strength, and cost. This MCDM approach enables ranking of available methods. The fundamental objective of the mentioned study is to calculate the most suitable RP method for manufacturing prototypes of sprinkler system components, enabling small scale manufacturers to develop innovative products efficiently and effectively.