Purpose This paper aims to empirically assess the effect of hospitality firms’ digital dynamic capabilities (DDC) on their corporate digital responsibilities (CDR) and the subsequent impact on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Specifically, it examines how CDR practices shape ESG digitization and performance in the hospitality industry. Design/methodology/approach The authors collect cross-sectional data via the online survey platform, gathering responses from 257 hotel firms across 42 countries and estimate the structural paths using partial least-squares (PLS) structural equation model. To reduce unobserved heterogeneity for robustness, the authors additionally implement finite mixture PLS (FIMIX-PLS), supported by a post hoc power analysis conducted through G*Power. Findings The results indicate that the three elements of DDC – digital sensing, digital seizing and digital reconfiguring – positively affect substantive and symbolic CDR of hospitality firms. Both CDRs simultaneously contribute positively to firms’ ESG digitization, whereas their direct effect on ESG performance is found to be insignificant. Given the positive impact of ESG digitization on ESG performance, this indicates that ESG digitization acts as a mediator, bridging the impact of both CDRs on ESG performance. Thus, DDC elements enhance CDRs, which, in turn, influence ESG performance indirectly through ESG digitization. Research limitations/implications The empirical support for the interconnected relationship between DDC, CDR and ESG performance provides hospitality and tourism managers with the latest understanding of the mechanism by which they can enhance sustainability performance. Originality/value This study addresses a significant gap in the prior literature by investigating how substantive and symbolic CDR practices differently impact ESG outcomes in the hospitality industry. From a dynamic capability perspective, the study integrates the concept of DDC with ESG and highlights their role in enhancing the effectiveness of CDR practices.
Kim et al. (Tue,) studied this question.