Analysis identifies trends and gaps in disaster risk reduction literature, highlighting publication metrics and citation scores.
The objective of this study was to assess the scholarly literature on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and determine how it has changed from 2014 to 2023. Clarivate's Web of Science database, which contains reputable and significant scientific research, was used to obtain published research articles on DRR. Numerous factors were considered, such as publications by journals, organizations, and nations, citation scores, and the increase in publications. We chose "Disaster Risk Reduction" as the key phrase for papers published during this period using state-of-the-art bibliometric techniques. The results reveal that from 2014 to 2023, 10,168 documents on DRR were published, involving 26,568 authors and 1,744 journals. Shaw R stands out significantly with the highest number of records (143) and the highest Total Global Citation Score (TGCS) (1515), indicating a robust research output and influence in the field. The International Journal of DRR is the dominant publication, with 3894 records, accounting for 38.3% of total contributions. Cutter SL (2003) leads with 429 records (4.2%), indicating a significant impact on the field. his foundational work has likely shaped subsequent research in disaster risk. Following closely is Cutter SL (2008), with 362 records (3.6%), further emphasizing the author's influential role in disaster studies. Our findings reveal emerging trends and highlight gaps in the current literature, offering insights for future research. By providing a thorough picture of the academic environment in this important area, this report seeks to support ongoing efforts to comprehend and reduce disaster risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anbukkarasi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: