Experimental study shows communication strategies reduce antibiotic expectations in patients, suggesting effective clinical practices.
Objectives Patients' expectations for antibiotics are among the strongest predictors of clinicians' decisions to overprescribe antibiotics. In this registered report, we used a signal detection theory framework to investigate the experimental effects of the communication interventions that family physicians can use to reduce patients' diagnostic uncertainty, and consequently, their antibiotic expectations. Methods UK participants ( N = 769) read hypothetical consultations for respiratory tract infections and were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: standard information (control), recommended information about the nature of the illness and antibiotic efficacy (recommended communication) or recommended information accompanied by point‐of‐care test results (recommended communication and CRP). Using a multilevel Bayesian probit regression, we estimated both decision bias (criterion) and sensitivity (d‐prime). Results Aligned with our bias hypotheses, participants displayed a more liberal antibiotic bias in the control condition compared to both the recommended communication (Δ c = −1.34, 95% CI [−1.57, −1.11]) and the recommended communication and CRP (Δ c = −1.73, 95% CI [−1.99, −1.48]) conditions. They also showed greater liberal bias in the recommended communication condition compared to the recommended communication and CRP condition (Δ c = −0.39, 95% CI [−0.65, 0.13]). Aligned with our sensitivity hypotheses, participants displayed significantly higher sensitivity in both the recommended communication (Δ d ' = 2.34, 95% CI [1.92, 2.79]) and the recommended communication and CRP (Δ d ' = 2.49, 95% CI [2.08, 2.95]) conditions compared to control. Conclusions Simple, evidence‐based communication strategies—particularly when combined with diagnostic test results—can reduce antibiotic expectations, offering practical tools for clinicians to support appropriate prescribing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theodoropoulou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: