Systematic review highlights distinct brain activation patterns in L2 and FL contexts, suggesting different cognitive mechanisms.
The acquisition of English as a non-native language can occur in either second language (L2) or foreign language (FL) contexts, which differ significantly in the cognitive and neural processes involved. While L2 acquisition tends to rely on implicit and procedural mechanisms, FL learning is based on explicit and declarative processes. From a cognitive neuroscience perspective, several studies have explored whether these contextual differences lead to distinct patterns of brain activation specific to English learning. A systematic review was conducted of studies published between 2015 and 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases. Empirical investigations employing neuroimaging techniques (DTI, EEG, ERP, fMRI, fNIRS) to analyze linguistic processing in English L2 or FL contexts were included. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, and refining the selection to focus exclusively on English, 18 primary studies were selected following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The reviewed studies indicate that English L2 acquisition in natural contexts predominantly activates multimodal networks associated with procedural memory, whereas English FL learning in formal educational settings involves greater activation of executive networks and declarative memory. Furthermore, differences in functional connectivity patterns were observed depending on the type of learning context. The evidence suggests that immersion contexts favor more automatic, holistic, and socially integrated linguistic processing, whereas classroom contexts promote more controlled and analytical processing. These findings underscore the need to adapt pedagogical strategies to the neurocognitive dynamics specific to each English learning context and highlight the importance of clearly distinguishing between L2 and FL in future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: