Neurovascular Sparing Transposition of Pterygopalatine Fossa: Anatomical Principles and Techniques

Objective Sacrifice of pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) neurovascular structures during endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach (EETPA) may impact a patient's comorbidity. We present anatomical and surgical techniques for maximizing PPF transposition while preserving its neurovascular structures through orbito‐pterygo‐sphenoidal (OPS) ligament release and descending palatine canal (DPC) decompression. Methods The EETPA was performed on six specimens. Two measurements were obtained to assess PPF transposition: (1) Inferior transposition (distance between the superior margins of the base of the pterygoid process and PPF); (2) lateral transposition (distance from Eustachian tube lateral margin to PPF medial margin). Results After incising the OPS ligament, a mean gain of PPF inferior transposition of 7 mm (4–11 mm, p = 0.03) was observed, with a total inferior transposition of 12 mm (6–15 mm). Subsequently, the posterior half of the inferior turbinate was removed and the DPC was decompressed, with a mean gain of PPF lateral transposition of 12 mm (range 8–15 mm, p = 0.01). Conclusion The OPS ligament release offers a significant advantage for the PPF inferior transposition, allowing access to the inferolateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, and paramedian middle cranial fossa, while the DPC decompression provides a significant advantage for the PPF lateral transposition, granting access to the Eustachian tube and ITF. Level of Evidence N/A.