Evaluation of EEG-driven classifiers classifies consumers as verbalizers or visualizers, highlighting implications for user-experience personalization.
Neuromarketing studies the brain function as a response to marketing stimuli. A large amount of neuromarketing research uses data from electroencephalography (EEG) recordings as a response of individuals’ brains to marketing stimuli, aiming to identify the factors that influence consumer behaviour that they cannot articulate or are reluctant to reveal. Evidence suggests that individuals’ processing styles affect their reaction to marketing stimuli. In this study, we propose and evaluate a predictive model that classifies consumers as verbalizers or visualizers based on EEG signals recorded during exposure to verbal, visual, and mixed advertisements. Participants (N = 22) were categorized into verbalizers and visualizers using the Style of Processing (SOP) scale and underwent EEG recording while viewing ads. The EEG signals were preprocessed and the five EEG frequency bands were extracted. We employed three classification models for every set of ads: SVM, Decision Tree, and kNN. While all three classifiers performed around the same, with accuracy between 86 and 93%, during cross-validation SVM proved to be the more effective model, with kNN and Decision Tree showing sensitivity to data imbalances. Additionally, we conducted independent t-tests to look for statistically significant differences between the two classes. The t-tests implicated the Theta frequency band. Therefore, these findings highlight the potential of leveraging EEG-based technology to effectively predict a consumer’s processing style for advertisements and offers practical applications in fields such as interactive content designs and user-experience personalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panteli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: