Randomized trial evaluated dose-response of HFC-L1/c4G12 in dogs with pulmonary metastatic oral malignant melanoma, suggesting higher doses may improve outcomes.
Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is a highly aggressive malignancy in dogs. The development of effective systemic therapies is urgently required to improve the treatment of canine OMM. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been investigated in canines following their dramatic success in human cancer treatment; however, there is still a need for extensive veterinary clinical studies to clarify and optimize their clinical benefits. Among the ICIs under development for canine cancer immunotherapy, c4G12 (HFC-L1), a canine chimeric anti-PD-L1 antibody, has shown promising efficacy in dogs with pulmonary metastatic OMM in previous clinical studies. However, the optimal dose of HFC-L1/c4G12 has not yet been determined. To explore the dose–response relationship of HFC-L1, a multicenter, randomized clinical study was conducted using three different doses (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every 2 weeks) to treat dogs with pulmonary metastatic OMM (n = 8–9 per group). The safety profiles were similar among the dose groups, and numerically longer median overall survival was achieved in the higher dose groups (5 and 10 mg/kg) than in the 2 mg/kg group. Although the study was exploratory in nature with a small sample size, 5–10 mg/kg should be considered the preferred dose in future clinical studies using HFC-L1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosoya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: