Comparative evaluation of RANSAC and DBSCAN in enhancing edge detection in point clouds, implying choices depend on data characteristics.
With the advancement of 3D sensing technologies, point clouds have become a key data format in the construction industry, supporting tasks such as as-built verification and BIM integration. However, robust and accurate edge detection from unstructured point cloud data remains a critical challenge, particularly in architectural environments characterized by structured geometry and variable noise conditions. This study presents a comparative evaluation of two classical edge detection algorithms—Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN)—applied to terrestrial laser-scanned point cloud data of eight rectangular structural columns. After preprocessing with the Statistical Outlier Removal (SOR) algorithm, the algorithms were evaluated using four performance criteria: edge detection quality, BIM-based geometric accuracy (via Cloud-to-Cloud distance), robustness to noise, and density-based performance. Results show that RANSAC consistently achieved higher geometric fidelity and stable detection across varying conditions, while DBSCAN showed greater resilience to residual noise and flexibility under low-density scenarios. Although DBSCAN occasionally outperformed RANSAC in local accuracy, it tended to over-segment edges in high-density regions. These findings underscore the importance of selecting algorithms based on data characteristics and project goals. This study establishes a reproducible framework for classical edge detection in architectural point cloud processing and supports future integration with BIM-based quality control systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: