Retrospective analysis shows socioeconomic status impacts visual acuity and treatment management in nAMD patients, suggesting disparities exist.
Purpose: To analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) outcomes and management. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 1449 patients diagnosed with nAMD, treated with anti-VEGF between January 2016-January 2024 Results: Lower income was associated with poorer baseline (p < .001) and final (p < .001) BCVA. Worse final visual acuity correlated with lower baseline BCVA (p < .001), lower income (p = .05) and older age (p < .001); insurance type did not (p = .558). Non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients exhibited a higher rate of delayed injections per scheduled visit than Hispanics (p =.002). Ethnicity correlated with insurance status (p = .008); Hispanic or Latino patients more often had Medicaid or commercial insurance; non-Hispanics/non-Latino patients more often had Medicare. Higher-income patients were more likely to receive aflibercept (p < .001) and faricimab (p =.021). Hispanic or Latino were more likely to receive bevacizumab (OR 2.49; p < .001), but insurance type modified this association (OR 3.42; p = .010). Conclusions: Lower income correlated with worse nAMD visual outcomes, and the type of anti-VEGF treatment used varied across income and ethnicity groups, but not insurance type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barthelemy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: