Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CivicXAI-Net effectively detects sentiment polarity and sarcasm in citizen comments, suggesting improved urban governance.
With growing reliance on real-time civic engagement systems in India's Smart Cities Mission, public opinion sentiment analysis as feedback has become most vital for responsive governance. But traditional sentiment analysis systems misinterpret sarcasm-laden discourse, especially in civic forums where rhetorical tone and passive aggression dominate citizen complaints. This paper introduces CivicXAI-Net, a lightweight, multi-output DistilBERT-based system that can sense sentiment polarity and sarcasm occurrence in parallel in civic comments. The model uses LIME and SHAP for token-wise explainability and offers interpretability in decision-making in Integrated Command and Control Centres (ICCCs). Trained on a harmonized dataset of 1,000 civic statements with synthetic, Twitter including a self-annotated sarcasm corpus [5], CivicXAI-Net achieves stable sarcasm detection (~61% accuracy) and offers contextual insights into citizen sentiment. The architecture is optimized for edge deployment, XAI compliance, and domain adaptation for urban governance. A case study in Tumakuru Smart City ICCC demonstrates its feasibility in policy response automation, detection of service dissatisfaction zones, and improving participatory feedback loops.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HV et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: