Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiments reveal illumination and cast shadows do not increase prey visibility to predators, suggesting limited influence on prey detection.
Many species use camouflage to dissimulate their true form and avoid detection or recognition. In natural habitats, the three-dimensional structure of an organism’s body can present challenges for camouflage, as overhead illumination creates luminance gradients (‘self-shadows’) across the body surface and cast shadows (when light is blocked by the object itself) on the surface behind the object. While self-shadows are known to increase prey detectability to predators, it is unclear whether this is also the case for cast shadows. We used computer-generated prey and live fish as predators (western rainbowfish; Melanotaenia australis ) to investigate whether the illumination conditions and the presence of cast shadows increase the detectability of prey. In the first experiment, the background contained directional illumination cues, while in the second experiment, targets were presented on a homogeneous grey background. In both experiments, we found that neither the illumination conditions nor the presence of a cast shadow (nor their interaction) increased the probability of detection by predators, despite differences in luminance variation among the different prey stimuli. Our findings suggest that cast shadows do not provide additional contrast to that produced by self-shadows and that cast shadows do not provide depth cues that increase prey detectability by predators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cauchi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: