Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies molecular alterations and tumor grade in CNS cancers, suggesting targeted therapy approaches.
AIMS This study investigated the genomic landscape of Central Nervous System (CNS) cancers, linking molecular al- terations, tumor grade, and patient demographics to advance diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. METHODS A comprehensive molecular analysis was performed on 96 diverse CNS tumor samples. Next-generation se- quencing (NGS) identified SNVs, CNVs, TMB and gene fusions, while immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessed PD- L1 expression and MSI status. All data were integrated with WHO tumor grade and patient demographics (43% female, 57% male). RESULTS The most frequently altered genes across all CNS cancer subtypes were TP53 (43%), TERT (42%), DST (33%), IDH1 (28%), EGFR (21%), and PTEN (21%). Distinct genetic profiles were observed across different WHO grades. Grade 1 tumors (n=1) showed a mutation in NF1. Grade 2 tumors (n=7) were characterized by IDH1 (43%), TERT (29%), and EGFR (14%) alterations. Grade 3 tumors (n=14) frequently harboured IDH1 (57%), TP53 (43%), and TERT (21%) mutations. Grade 4 tumors (n=66) showed prevalent alterations in TERT (51%), EGFR (29%), TP53 (42%), and PTEN (29%). High-grade tumors (Grades 3 and 4) exhibited a higher frequency of TERT, TP53, and PTEN mutations compared to low-grade tumors (Grades 1 and 2). PD-L1 positivity was observed in only 8% (4/51) of evaluable cases, and only 9% (4/45) exhibited high TMB (≥10 mutations/mb). All 49 evaluable cases were microsatellite stable (MSS). CONCLUSION This comprehensive molecular characterization of CNS cancers reveals distinct genetic alterations linked to tu- mor grade and subtype. The differences in genetic landscapes between high- and low-grade tumors underscore the clinical value of molecular profiling, providing actionable insights for treatment strategies. The low PD-L1 positivity, low TMB, and MSS status observed in this cohort suggest limited efficacy of immune checkpoint in- hibitors, highlighting the urgent need to explore alternative therapeutic avenues, including targeted therapies tailored to the identified molecular markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Neill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: