This analysis applies logistics monitoring and Harrington’s desirability function to evaluate transport service quality, suggesting actionable improvements for SDG 9.
The quality of transport services is not only a measure of operational efficiency but also an important factor of strategic logistics management in the pursuit of sustainable development. This study identifies five key transport service quality indicators (timeliness, routing, economy, safety, efficiency) and uses data from a logistics monitoring system to assess them with Harrington’s desirability function. Each indicator’s performance is converted into a partial desirability score and these scores are combined into a single overall desirability score (D), with weights determined from the data. Notably, a threshold around D = 0.63 emerged as the benchmark for acceptable service quality. This numeric threshold provides managers with a clear KPI target—if the service quality index falls below 0.63, it signals the need for corrective action, whereas consistently achieving values near 0.8 reflects very good performance aligned with strategic sustainability goals. Based on the proposed approach, an algorithm and software tool were developed to automate the assessment process. The obtained results show how improvements in service reliability, safety and efficiency can be aligned with broader sustainability goals in automotive transportation. The proposed approach offers managerial decision makers a robust tool to guide policy and investment, ensuring that enhancements in transport service performance also advance environmental and social sustainability. In doing so, the framework advances SDG 9 by turning logistics telemetry into an actionable management index that strengthens resilient transport infrastructure and fosters practical innovation at the enterprise level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Аулін et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: