Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated high-throughput experimentation improves solvation competition in nonaqueous redox-flow batteries, indicating a novel approach for electrolyte formulation.
In nonaqueous redox-flow batteries (NRFBs), redox-active organic molecules (ROMs) and supporting salts compete for solvation sites, limiting achievable energy density. We combine automated high-throughput experimentation (HTE) with camera-based saturation monitoring and quantitative NMR to measure paired (ROM, salt) solubilities across single and mixed organic solvents. Using 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BTZ) with lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) as a model system, we find that a binary m-xylene/acetonitrile mixture dissolves ≈3 M of both BTZ and LiTFSI─surpassing the previously reported 2 M ceiling for neat acetonitrile─by leveraging complementary solvation (MX is BTZ-philic and salt-phobic; ACN stabilizes LiTFSI). A random-forest model (RMSE ≈ 0.24) trained on solvent descriptors highlights log P and salt concentration as dominant predictors and predicts MX/ACN ≈0.3/0.7 (v/v) to be near-optimal. These formulations retain practical viscosity and ∼5 mS·cm–1 conductivity at high loading. The workflow provides a reproducible, data-centric route to NRFB electrolyte design and motivates an open, standardized dual-solute solubility resource for accelerated electrolyte discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: