This framework improves traffic efficiency in on-ramp merging for connected and automated vehicles, highlighting inter-agent coordination.
To improve the traffic efficiency of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) in on-ramp merging areas, this study proposes a novel region-level multi-agent reinforcement learning framework, Regionally Coordinated Nash-Advantage Decomposition Deep Q-Network with Conflict-Aware Q Fusion (RC-NashAD-DQN). Unlike existing vehicle-level control methods, which suffer from high computational overhead and poor scalability, our approach abstracts on-ramp and main road areas as region-level control agents, achieving coordinated yet independent decision-making while maintaining control precision and merging efficiency comparable to fine-grained vehicle-level approaches. Each agent adopts a value–advantage decomposition architecture to enhance policy stability and distinguish action values, while sharing state–action information to improve inter-agent awareness. A Nash equilibrium solver is applied to derive joint strategies, and a conflict-aware Q-fusion mechanism is introduced as a regularization term rather than a direct action-selection tool, enabling the system to resolve local conflicts—particularly at region boundaries—without compromising global coordination. This design reduces training complexity, accelerates convergence, and improves robustness against communication imperfections. The framework is evaluated using the SUMO simulator at the Taishan Road interchange on the S1 Yongtaiwen Expressway under heterogeneous traffic conditions involving both passenger cars and container trucks, and is compared with baseline models including C-DRL-VSL and MADDPG. Extensive simulations demonstrate that RC-NashAD-DQN significantly improves average traffic speed by 17.07% and reduces average delay by 12.68 s, outperforming all baselines in efficiency metrics while maintaining robust convergence performance. These improvements enhance cooperation and merging efficiency among vehicles, contributing to sustainable urban mobility and the advancement of intelligent transportation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: