Automated guided vehicle (AGV) scheduling in large warehouses becomes increasingly difficult as dense traffic and concentrated charging demands interact at shared intersections. Vehicle-centric multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) also faces increasing state dimensionality and non-stationarity as the fleet grows. This study therefore models controlled road-network nodes, rather than individual AGVs, as agents and develops a Nash-D3QN framework for traffic–energy coordinated scheduling. A* generates initial feasible paths, Nash-D3QN allocates intersection right-of-way using local and neighboring states, and a shared Petri-net layer enforces occupancy and safety constraints. State of charge (SOC), payload, start–stop losses, and charging queues are incorporated into the state, action, and reward designs to favor low-SOC and heavily loaded AGVs when necessary. In the 50-AGV scenario, Nash-D3QN shows numerically higher task completion rates than the compared baselines by 0.41–1.40 percentage points, together with 7.6–24.0% lower average waiting time, 4.7–46.0% higher SOC efficiency, and 8.38–32.42 percentage points higher coordination rates. Multi-seed analysis further evaluates task completion, coordination, SOC-based task efficiency, and waiting time at 50, 110, and 200 AGVs. With 200 AGVs, Nash-D3QN retains approximately 76.34% task completion, 2.68 tasks/SOC efficiency, and 86.17% coordination, indicating performance retention under larger tested system scales and operating loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: