Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the rapid growth of job-related crimes in developing economies, there is an urgent need for intelligent judicial systems to standardize sentencing practices. This study proposes a Multi-Level Feature Fusion Network (MLFFN) to enhance the accuracy and interpretability of sentencing predictions in job-related crime cases. The model integrates hierarchical legal feature representation, beginning with benchmark judgments (including starting-point penalties and additional penalties) as the foundational input. The frontend of MLFFN employs an attention mechanism to dynamically fuse word-level, segment-level, and position-level embeddings, generating a global feature encoding that captures critical legal relationships. The backend utilizes sliding-window convolutional kernels to extract localized features from the global feature map, preserving nuanced contextual factors that influence sentencing ranges. Trained on a dataset of job-related crime cases, MLFFN achieves a 6%+ performance improvement over the baseline models (BERT-base-Chinese, TextCNN, and ERNIE) in sentencing prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that explicit modeling of legal hierarchies and contextual constraints significantly improves judicial AI systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: