Supplementary Figure 1 from Accuracy of HPV Self-Collection Compared with Clinician-Collected HPV Testing and Cytology: A Meta-analysis

Sarah A. Phillips; Sophie Denoël; Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn

doi:10.1158/1055-9965.30029161

September 2, 2025Open Access

Supplementary Figure 1 from Accuracy of HPV Self-Collection Compared with Clinician-Collected HPV Testing and Cytology: A Meta-analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Sensitivity and specificity of cytology for detecting CIN2+ are evaluated in referral populations using HPV assays.
Forest plots highlight key metrics of accuracy for different testing methods in the analysis.
The meta-analysis incorporates various studies assessing the performance of cytology and HPV tests.
Findings suggest that self-collection methods may provide effective alternatives to clinician-collected samples.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Meta-analysis reveals sensitivity and specificity of cytology for CIN2+ detection using HPV assays, suggesting self-collection may be effective.

Abstract

Supplementary Figure 1 shows forest plots of the sensitivity and specificity of cytology for CIN2+ detection in studies using PCR-based HPV assays on referral populations.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Phillips et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c182609b7b07f3a060f66c https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.30029161

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Supplementary Figure 1 from Accuracy of HPV Self-Collection Compared with Clinician-Collected HPV Testing and Cytology: A Meta-analysis

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Supplementary Figure 1 from Accuracy of HPV Self-Collection Compared with Clinician-Collected HPV Testing and Cytology: A Meta-analysis

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading