Observational analysis investigates associations of oxygen uptake and cardiac structure in pediatric athletes, suggesting vital cardiovascular adaptations.
Aims: This study aims to investigate the longitudinal associations between changes in maximal cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and vascular/cardiac structure and function in paediatric athletes. Methods: 142 paediatric athletes with data for baseline and a one-year follow-up from the Munich Cardiovascular Adaptation in Young Athletes (MuCAYA) study (mean [SD] age at baseline: 14.0 [2.9] years; 17 girls) were included. Parameters for CRF were VO 2peak (L/min), relative VO 2peak (ml/min/kg), and maximum (watts) and relative power output (watts/kg). We applied linear mixed-effect models for repeated measures to examine the prospective associations between the one-year progression of CRF with the progression of vascular and cardiac parameters. Results: One-year progression in VO 2peak was associated with increases in central systolic blood pressure (SBP) and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), while a one-year progression in maximum physical performance was associated with increases in central SBP, aortic PWV, and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). A one-year VO 2peak progression was associated with a decrease in ejection fraction and an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVIDd), and internal dimension (LVIDs), interventricular septal thickness (IVSd), LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWd), left ventricular mass (LVM), LVM to body surface area (BSA, LVM/BSA), and LVM/height 2.7 . Maximum power output progression was further associated with decreases in ejection fraction but increases in LVIDd, LVIDs, IVSd, LVPWd, LVM, LVM/BSA, and LVM/height 2.7 . Conclusion: We demonstrate the paradoxical relationships between increased CRF and increased cardiovascular parameters in paediatric athletes, suggesting that vascular and cardiac functional and structural physiologic remodelling may be present in adolescent athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumgartner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: