Key result
Training intensity tracks with higher VO2peak, whereas peak power is driven primarily by body surface area.
Why the study?
How do cardiorespiratory fitness parameters, specifically VO2peak and Wmax, develop longitudinally in youth competitive athletes?
Cohort (n=397)
No
How do cardiorespiratory fitness parameters, specifically VO2peak and Wmax, develop longitudinally in youth competitive athletes?
VO2peak serves as a sensitive marker of aerobic adaptation in youth athletes influenced by training intensity, whereas Wmax is primarily a reflection of somatic growth.
VO2peak may track aerobic training effects in youth athletes; leaves open causal distinction from growth on Wmax.
PURPOSE: While the development of cardiorespiratory fitness in normally active children and adolescents is well-documented, longitudinal data on physiological adaptations to training in youth athletes remain limited. This study aimed to investigate the long-term development of cardiorespiratory fitness in young competitive athletes over a period of 2-6 years. METHODS: A total of 397 young athletes (48 girls), aged 8-20 years, from a variety of sports underwent up to 6 repeated assessments between 2012 and 2024. Peak exercise performance (Wmax) and peak aerobic power (VO2peak), both were measured via cardiopulmonary exercise testing on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. A linear mixed model analysis was used to evaluate longitudinal changes in VO2peak and Wmax (both normalized to body mass), including body surface area and training intensity (MET-hours/week) as fixed effects, with sex-stratified analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1009 cardiopulmonary exercise testing were analyzed. At baseline, boys showed higher age-specific VO2peak and Wmax, while girls had higher age-specific VO2peak despite similar training intensity. Longitudinally, VO2peak increased significantly with age in mid-adolescent girls and boys, particularly in endurance athletes, and was positively associated with training intensity. Wmax rose with age but was less influenced by training or sport type, showing a stronger relationship with growth-related factors like body surface area. CONCLUSIONS: VO2peak development in youth athletes is influenced by age, body size, training intensity, and sport type, making it a sensitive marker of aerobic adaptation. In contrast, Wmax reflects primarily maturational growth and is less responsive to training-specific factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köble et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Healthy youth athletes (n=397). Structured athletic training was evaluated on Longitudinal changes in peak aerobic power (VO2peak) and peak exercise performance (Wmax). VO2peak increased significantly with age and training intensity as a marker of aerobic adaptation, while Wmax was primarily driven by maturational growth factors like body surface area.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: